But precision in terms of the polished feeling everywhere from packaging, to software interface to consistent performance across many of their supported platforms including the versions of Windows and Linux that we tested. The New York Times. The ioDrive Duo in Linux saw consistent peaks to 1,ms in most workloads, while the Windows driver was much calmer. IoMemory is also non-traditional in the sense that it consumes system resources for the VSL drivers to function, leveraging the host CPU while also creating a footprint in system memory. Fusion-io called their architecture ioMemory. Regardless of the operating system used, the experience is nearly identical, down to the supplied GUI and console management tools.
|Date Added:||16 January 2005|
|File Size:||6.72 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In some cases we saw performance more than double.
Fusion-io ioDrive installation on Windows Server 2012 R2
iodrice In this we limit effective queue depth to 8 in the weaker profile and increase it to 48 in the Heavy profile. Archived from the original on October 14, Navigation menu Personal tools Create account Log in.
Retrieved November 21, With performance and latency going hand in hand, we looked at average and peak latency during our low queue depth 4K random transfer test. This is why its important to monitor not only peak latency to see the highest peaks, but also to look at standard deviation, which shows the variation in latency. The first is our standard low queue-depth tests, which are performed at a queue depth of 4 per worker 4 workers total spread out over two managers.
Fusion-io ioDrive installation – HP Support- Windows install – ServeTheHome
Average latency was near identical across the board, showing little signs of improving with additional wndows. The way we look at PCIe storage solutions dives deeper than just looking at traditional burst or steady-state performance. To see more detailed information, there is also a page that offers the full printout of specs of the currently selected ioMemory device.
The ioDrive Duo is a complete offering that is more refined than anything else on wiindows enterprise storage market. This was while the Windows performance remained tight until the highest workloads. We captured the activity of our StorageReview mail server over a period of days. The ioDrive Duo in Linux saw consistent peaks to iodrivee in most workloads, while the Qindows driver was much calmer.
This page was last edited on 29 Septemberat The OCZ Z-Drive R4 had a wide range of higher latency output over the duration of our test, although it did start to even out at times once it reached steady-state, although still had periods of time with high latency again. DEMO Fall conference alumni information.
Archived from the original on June 28, In this test performance of the ioDrive Duo peaked with a speed ofIOPS write at a queue depth of 4, leveling off betweentoIOPS between a queue depth of 8 to Given the consistent standard deviation though, many of those blips were few time events, instead of consistently hitting higher response rates.
The Z-Drives strengths were more on the read-heavy side, whereas the ioDrive Duo and WarpDrive found their place in a write-heavy environment. Up until the highest loads, the ioDrive Duo in Windows maintained the lowest standard deviation, with the Linux driver following slightly behind, followed by the WarpDrive and then the Z-Drive R4 in Windows.
IoMemory is also non-traditional in the sense that it consumes system resources for the VSL drivers to function, leveraging the host CPU while also creating a footprint in system memory.
With high-end enterprise products, latency is often more important than throughput. Comparing the peak latency in the File Server workload, the ioDrive Duo calmed down greatly in Linux, losing many of its 1,ms peaks from before.
In and Fusion-io was criticized for depending too heavily on two major customers—Facebook and Apple. When we tested the ioDrive Duo in its high-performance mode, which dropped the formatted capacity to GB from GB per ioDimm, performance more than doubled in some cases. That is more than a 2x jump by sacrificing some user-capacity.
To decide which option makes the most sense for an installation, Fusion-io has a server configuration guide for most tier one qindows that provides best case setup instructions. Archived from the original PDF on April 20, Almost all of the high-latency spikes were suppressed with increased over-provisioning, with the Linux performance improving the most.
That’s not just precision in terms of performance, which even as prior generation technology, it does well. With that said, they weren’t entirely gone, but the bulk of the activity dropped to much lower iovrive. Have a look at Thomas-Krenn. Looking idrive the ioDrive Duo, while its Linux performance had the edge in throughput and average response times, it had some of the highest spikes in this test, pushing upwards of 1,ms, whereas the Windows driver was much calmer with its spikes generally in the ms range except for one large spike to over 1,ms.